chicagovps，以前出现过数据丢失，出现过因为solusvm漏洞会员数据被暴库，总之在国内外评价褒贬不一，但是因为便宜还是拥有大量的忠实粉丝，本人目前有他们家2G内存年付30刀的那款【chicagovps-2g内存/50g硬盘/2IP/2T流量/月付2.66美元】，还有就是下面即将测评的这个SSD硬盘的VPS。如果对低价版VPS感兴趣的话其实建站也是可以的：记住备份！就目前我测试过的情况来看，SSD硬盘的VPS比较贵，超售的可能性不大或者超售的不多，性能优异！
128M内存，1核CPU（3.4Ghz）3G SSD,100G流量，月付1.25美元，购买地址 查看： 更多配置
两款特价版：
OpenVZ SSD-Pure 1024MB
1024M内存
1024M SWAP
20G SSD 硬盘
1000G流量
1Gbps端口
1 IPv4
SolusVM/OpenVZ
$4.50/Monthly
购买地址
2G内存/2GB SWAP
30G SSD 硬盘
2000G流量
1Gbps端口
1 IPv4
OpenVZ+SolusVM
$7/Monthly
购买地址
数据中心Loc: 洛杉矶 芝加哥 亚特兰大
看看内存：
root@gongyi:~# free -m
total used free shared buffers cached
Mem: 1024 16 1007 0 0 11
-/+ buffers/cache: 5 1018
Swap: 1024 0 1024
默认系统（debian 6,32位）空转情况下：
top – 20:28:13 up 4 min, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.00
Tasks: 13 total, 1 running, 12 sleeping, 0 stopped, 0 zombie
Cpu(s): 0.0%us, 0.0%sy, 0.0%ni,100.0%id, 0.0%wa, 0.0%hi, 0.0%si, 0.0%st
Mem: 1048576k total, 17256k used, 1031320k free, 0k buffers
Swap: 1048576k total, 0k used, 1048576k free, 11660k cached
PID USER PR NI VIRT RES SHR S %CPU %MEM TIME+ COMMAND
1 root 20 0 2028 728 632 S 0 0.1 0:00.00 init
2 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 kthreadd/20033
3 root 20 0 0 0 0 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 khelper/20033
439 root 20 0 1736 640 532 S 0 0.1 0:00.00 syslogd
458 root 20 0 8668 808 472 S 0 0.1 0:00.00 saslauthd
459 root 20 0 8668 380 44 S 0 0.0 0:00.00 saslauthd
509 root 20 0 5488 956 572 S 0 0.1 0:00.00 sshd
520 root 20 0 2392 864 696 S 0 0.1 0:00.00 xinetd
548 root 20 0 2288 856 676 S 0 0.1 0:00.00 cron
554 root 20 0 9996 1564 532 S 0 0.1 0:00.00 sendmail-mta
582 root 20 0 8544 3004 2456 S 0 0.3 0:00.04 sshd
584 root 20 0 2960 1616 1288 S 0 0.2 0:00.00 bash
592 root 20 0 2328 1084 892 R 0 0.1 0:00.00 top
VPS这次给的U真不错，4核【Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270】
root@gongyi:~# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 58
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 V2 @ 3.50GHz
stepping : 9
cpu MHz : 3499.995
cache size : 8192 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 8
core id : 0
cpu cores : 4
apicid : 0
initial apicid : 0
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 13
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 moni”不可描述” ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm pcid sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt tsc_deadline_timer aes xsave avx f16c rdrand lahf_lm ida arat epb xsaveopt pln pts dts tpr_”不可描述” vnmi flexpriority ept vpid fsgsbase smep erms
bogomips : 6999.99
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
processor : 1
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 58
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 V2 @ 3.50GHz
stepping : 9
cpu MHz : 3499.995
cache size : 8192 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 8
core id : 1
cpu cores : 4
apicid : 2
initial apicid : 2
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 13
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 moni”不可描述” ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm pcid sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt tsc_deadline_timer aes xsave avx f16c rdrand lahf_lm ida arat epb xsaveopt pln pts dts tpr_”不可描述” vnmi flexpriority ept vpid fsgsbase smep erms
bogomips : 6999.99
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
processor : 2
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 58
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 V2 @ 3.50GHz
stepping : 9
cpu MHz : 3499.995
cache size : 8192 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 8
core id : 2
cpu cores : 4
apicid : 4
initial apicid : 4
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 13
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 moni”不可描述” ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm pcid sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt tsc_deadline_timer aes xsave avx f16c rdrand lahf_lm ida arat epb xsaveopt pln pts dts tpr_”不可描述” vnmi flexpriority ept vpid fsgsbase smep erms
bogomips : 6999.99
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
processor : 3
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 58
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 V2 @ 3.50GHz
stepping : 9
cpu MHz : 3499.995
cache size : 8192 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 8
core id : 3
cpu cores : 4
apicid : 6
initial apicid : 6
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 13
wp : yes
flags : fpu vme de pse tsc msr pae mce cx8 apic sep mtrr pge mca cmov pat pse36 clflush dts acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht tm pbe syscall nx rdtscp lm constant_tsc arch_perfmon pebs bts rep_good xtopology nonstop_tsc aperfmperf pni pclmulqdq dtes64 moni”不可描述” ds_cpl vmx smx est tm2 ssse3 cx16 xtpr pdcm pcid sse4_1 sse4_2 x2apic popcnt tsc_deadline_timer aes xsave avx f16c rdrand lahf_lm ida arat epb xsaveopt pln pts dts tpr_”不可描述” vnmi flexpriority ept vpid fsgsbase smep erms
bogomips : 6999.99
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 36 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:
20G SSD默认的情况：
root@gongyi:~# df -lh
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/simfs 20G 528M 20G 3% /
tmpfs 512M 0 512M 0% /lib/init/rw
tmpfs 512M 0 512M 0% /dev/shm
服务器在洛杉矶，先试试cachefly 100M下载：
root@gongyi:~# wget http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
–2013-12-17 20:29:27– http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net… 205.234.175.175
Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80… connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: `100mb.test’
100%[===========================================>] 104,857,600 93.2M/s in 1.1s
2013-12-17 20:29:28 (93.2 MB/s) – `100mb.test’ saved [104857600/104857600]
下载个凤凰城的500M文件：
root@gongyi:~# wget http://yum.phx.singlehop.com/singlehop/500megabytefile.tar.gz
–2013-12-17 20:29:49– http://yum.phx.singlehop.com/singlehop/500megabytefile.tar.gz
Resolving yum.phx.singlehop.com… 108.178.62.202
Connecting to yum.phx.singlehop.com|108.178.62.202|:80… connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
Length: 500000000 (477M) [application/x-gzip]
Saving to: `500megabytefile.tar.gz’
100%[===========================================>] 500,000,000 53.0M/s in 8.0s
2013-12-17 20:29:57 (59.6 MB/s) – `500megabytefile.tar.gz’ saved [500000000/500000000]
下载个日本东京的100M文件：
root@gongyi:~# wget http://speedtest.tokyo.linode.com/100MB-tokyo.bin
–2013-12-17 20:30:13– http://speedtest.tokyo.linode.com/100MB-tokyo.bin
Resolving speedtest.tokyo.linode.com… 106.187.96.148, 2400:8900::4b
Connecting to speedtest.tokyo.linode.com|106.187.96.148|:80… connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: `100MB-tokyo.bin’
100%[===========================================>] 104,857,600 14.2M/s in 8.3s
2013-12-17 20:30:22 (12.1 MB/s) – `100MB-tokyo.bin’ saved [104857600/104857600]
下载个英国伦敦的100M文件：
root@gongyi:~# wget http://speedtest.london.linode.com/100MB-london.bin
–2013-12-17 20:30:36– http://speedtest.london.linode.com/100MB-london.bin
Resolving speedtest.london.linode.com… 176.58.107.39, 2a01:7e00::4b
Connecting to speedtest.london.linode.com|176.58.107.39|:80… connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response… 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: `100MB-london.bin’
100%[===========================================>] 104,857,600 10.8M/s in 11s
2013-12-17 20:30:47 (9.37 MB/s) – `100MB-london.bin’ saved [104857600/104857600]
测试硬盘I/O，SSD盘效果还可以：
root@gongyi:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k conv=fdatasync
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 2.06269 s, 521 MB/s
用freevps.us家的脚本简单泡一下：
root@gongyi:~# wget freevps.us/downloads/bench.sh -O – -o /dev/null|bash
CPU model : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 V2 @ 3.50GHz
Number of cores : 4
CPU frequency : 3499.995 MHz
Total amount of ram : 1024 MB
Total amount of swap : 1024 MB
System uptime : 7 min,
Download speed from CacheFly: 82.7MB/s
Download speed from Coloat, Atlanta GA: 6.10MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Dallas, TX: 31.9MB/s
Download speed from Linode, Tokyo, JP: 12.4MB/s
Download speed from i3d.net, Rotterdam, NL: 7.14MB/s
Download speed from Leaseweb, Haarlem, NL: 6.38MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Singapore: 6.34MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Seattle, WA: 8.95MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, San Jose, CA: 71.4MB/s
Download speed from Softlayer, Washington, DC: 16.4MB/s
I/O speed : 553 MB/s
unix bench mark
# # # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #
# # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # # #
# # # # # # ## ##### ##### # # # # ######
# # # # # # ## # # # # # # # # #
# # # ## # # # # # # # ## # # # #
#### # # # # # ##### ###### # # #### # #
Version 5.1.3 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark
Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
Sunnyvale, CA, USA
January 13, 2011 johantheghost at yahoo period com
1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3
1 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Process Creation 1 2 3
1 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3
1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3
4 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
4 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
4 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3
4 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3
4 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3
4 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3
4 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
4 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
4 x Process Creation 1 2 3
4 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
4 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3
4 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3
========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.3)
System: gongyi: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux — 2.6.32-042stab081.5 — #1 SMP Mon Sep 30 16:52:24 MSK 2013
Machine: i686 (unknown)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap=”ANSI_X3.4-1968″, collate=”ANSI_X3.4-1968″)
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 V2 @ 3.50GHz (7000.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 V2 @ 3.50GHz (7000.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 V2 @ 3.50GHz (7000.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E3-1270 V2 @ 3.50GHz (7000.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET, Intel virtualization
20:34:04 up 10 min, 1 user, load average: 0.23, 0.10, 0.02; runlevel 2
————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Tue Dec 17 2013 20:34:04 – 21:02:14
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 17034852.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 3237.3 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 3675.0 lps (29.6 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 478797.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 136407.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1292460.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 953553.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 154652.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 8802.8 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 4472.6 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1115.5 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 750312.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 17034852.4 1459.7
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 3237.3 588.6
Execl Throughput 43.0 3675.0 854.6
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 478797.9 1209.1
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 136407.3 824.2
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1292460.9 2228.4
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 953553.5 766.5
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 154652.6 386.6
Process Creation 126.0 8802.8 698.6
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 4472.6 1054.9
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1115.5 1859.1
System Call Overhead 15000.0 750312.0 500.2
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 912.0
————————————————————————
Benchmark Run: Tue Dec 17 2013 21:02:14 – 21:31:47
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 34110184.6 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 12425.2 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 10805.0 lps (29.8 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 529381.1 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 153437.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1521369.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 2093365.2 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 395249.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 22423.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 10419.2 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1482.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 1752533.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 34110184.6 2922.9
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 12425.2 2259.1
Execl Throughput 43.0 10805.0 2512.8
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 529381.1 1336.8
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 153437.6 927.1
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1521369.8 2623.1
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 2093365.2 1682.8
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 395249.4 988.1
Process Creation 126.0 22423.3 1779.6
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 10419.2 2457.3
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1482.8 2471.3
System Call Overhead 15000.0 1752533.4 1168.4
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 1796.8
======= Script description and score comparison completed! =======
