virmach-简单测评:凤凰城机房,2G内存特价VPS

2016年1月18日22:36:18 8 1,782

接着昨天的virmach的特价vps【干货:virmach-$2/Win/1g内存/15gSSD/1T流量/洛杉矶/芝加哥/纽约】,我这里上个简单的测试,测试用的是2G内存的凤凰城机房的VPS,年付16美元。相对来说这款VPS是比较适合zzz或者一些小型应用,CPU限频比较厉害,但是网络还是不错,毕竟是便宜货所以还是自己看需求吧。

内存:没有swap

v2

CPU:

v3

硬盘:

v4

 

v5

硬盘I/O:

v6

网络测试:

v1

UNIX BENCH

 

v7

这款VPS的弱点在CPU的频率限制上面,大家可以选择洛杉矶等机房试试看!

发表评论

:?: :razz: :sad: :evil: :!: :smile: :oops: :grin: :eek: :shock: :???: :cool: :lol: :mad: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :idea: :arrow: :neutral: :cry: :mrgreen:

目前评论:8   其中:访客  4   博主  4

    • avatar admin Admin


      ———————————————————————- —
      Benchmark Run: Sat Jan 16 2016 02:14:21 – 02:42:38
      2 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

      Dhrystone 2 using register variables 19020401.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
      Double-Precision Whetstone 2738.4 MWIPS (10.0 s, 7 samples)
      Execl Throughput 1894.3 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
      File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 426646.3 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
      File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 118944.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
      File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1036750.4 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
      Pipe Throughput 757028.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
      Pipe-based Context Switching 112971.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
      Process Creation 5453.5 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
      Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 4006.3 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
      Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 868.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
      System Call Overhead 681967.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

      System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
      Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 19020401.3 1 629.9
      Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 2738.4 497.9
      Execl Throughput 43.0 1894.3 440.5
      File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 426646.3 1 077.4
      File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 118944.0 718.7
      File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 1036750.4 1 787.5
      Pipe Throughput 12440.0 757028.3 608.5
      Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 112971.5 282.4
      Process Creation 126.0 5453.5 432.8
      Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 4006.3 944.9
      Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 868.9 1 448.2
      System Call Overhead 15000.0 681967.7 454.6
      === =====
      System Benchmarks Index Score 730.0

      ———————————————————————- —
      Benchmark Run: Sat Jan 16 2016 02:42:38 – 03:11:13
      2 CPUs in system; running 2 parallel copies of tests

      Dhrystone 2 using register variables 23664472.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
      Double-Precision Whetstone 4723.5 MWIPS (10.1 s, 7 samples)
      Execl Throughput 5293.0 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
      File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 356176.5 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
      File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 101708.9 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
      File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 970040.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
      Pipe Throughput 902915.8 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
      Pipe-based Context Switching 234701.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
      Process Creation 7870.3 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
      Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 5837.9 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
      Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1063.1 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
      System Call Overhead 782998.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

      System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
      Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 23664472.0 2 027.8
      Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4723.5 858.8
      Execl Throughput 43.0 5293.0 1 230.9
      File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 356176.5 899.4
      File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 101708.9 614.6
      File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 970040.8 1 672.5
      Pipe Throughput 12440.0 902915.8 725.8
      Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 234701.7 586.8
      Process Creation 126.0 7870.3 624.6
      Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 5837.9 1 376.9
      Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 1063.1 1 771.8
      System Call Overhead 15000.0 782998.3 522.0
      === =====
      System Benchmarks Index Score 967.3

      • avatar sabele 4

        “饭zzz”网速怎么样?

          • avatar a1829 4

            现在cc“饭zzz”一点也不比qn慢,很快

              • avatar admin Admin

                确实是这样的,“饭zzz”,建站速度都不慢,估计是折腾的人少了吧,大家都觉得CC不好,大家都不用。

            • avatar jack 3

              Architecture: x86_64
              CPU op-mode(s): 32-bit, 64-bit
              Byte Order: Little Endian
              CPU(s): 1
              On-line CPU(s) list: 0
              Thread(s) per core: 1
              Core(s) per socket: 1
              Socket(s): 1
              NUMA node(s): 1
              Vendor ID: GenuineIntel
              CPU family: 6
              Model: 13
              Stepping: 3
              CPU MHz: 2399.996
              BogoMIPS: 4799.99
              Hypervisor vendor: KVM
              Virtualization type: full
              L1d cache: 32K
              L1i cache: 32K
              L2 cache: 4096K
              NUMA node0 CPU(s): 0
              同是凤凰城,你我cpu怎么差这么多。。明白了,你的是openvz的。我是kvm的。

                • avatar admin Admin

                  KVM的优势就在这里体现出来了!

                • avatar abczhou 0

                  cc qn 都是什么意思啊?

                    • avatar admin Admin

                      CC=colorcrossing.com
                      QN=quadranet.com

                      就是两个提供服务器出租和托管的机房!