LFCVPS简单测评

2012年10月16日01:29:35 3 1,447

测试时间10月17日凌晨一点开始对LFC进行测评,简单的看了下,整体说来性能一般,这可能与时间上的问题有关正是服务器使用高峰期。

CPU型号 [4核] Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz | 频率:2000.000 | 二级缓存:15360 KB | Bogomips:4000.00 ×4
[email protected]:~# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor       : 0
vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
cpu family      : 6
model           : 45
model name      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz
stepping        : 7
cpu MHz         : 2000.000
cache size      : 15360 KB
fdiv_bug        : no
hlt_bug         : no
f00f_bug        : no
coma_bug        : no
fpu             : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level     : 10
wp              : yes
flags           : fpu tsc msr pae cx8 cmov pat clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss nx constant_tsc pni pclmulqdq vmx ssse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt aes avx hypervisor tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid
bogomips        : 4000.00
clflush size    : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes   : 46 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor       : 1
vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
cpu family      : 6
model           : 45
model name      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz
stepping        : 7
cpu MHz         : 2000.000
cache size      : 15360 KB
fdiv_bug        : no
hlt_bug         : no
f00f_bug        : no
coma_bug        : no
fpu             : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level     : 10
wp              : yes
flags           : fpu tsc msr pae cx8 cmov pat clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss nx constant_tsc pni pclmulqdq vmx ssse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt aes avx hypervisor tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid
bogomips        : 4000.00
clflush size    : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes   : 46 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor       : 2
vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
cpu family      : 6
model           : 45
model name      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz
stepping        : 7
cpu MHz         : 2000.000
cache size      : 15360 KB
fdiv_bug        : no
hlt_bug         : no
f00f_bug        : no
coma_bug        : no
fpu             : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level     : 10
wp              : yes
flags           : fpu tsc msr pae cx8 cmov pat clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss nx constant_tsc pni pclmulqdq vmx ssse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt aes avx hypervisor tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid
bogomips        : 4000.00
clflush size    : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes   : 46 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor       : 3
vendor_id       : GenuineIntel
cpu family      : 6
model           : 45
model name      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz
stepping        : 7
cpu MHz         : 2000.000
cache size      : 15360 KB
fdiv_bug        : no
hlt_bug         : no
f00f_bug        : no
coma_bug        : no
fpu             : yes
fpu_exception   : yes
cpuid level     : 10
wp              : yes
flags           : fpu tsc msr pae cx8 cmov pat clflush mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss nx constant_tsc pni pclmulqdq vmx ssse3 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt aes avx hypervisor tpr_shadow vnmi flexpriority ept vpid
bogomips        : 4000.00
clflush size    : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes   : 46 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

内存:

[email protected]:~# cat /proc/meminfo
MemTotal:         253692 kB
MemFree:            3680 kB
Buffers:           22720 kB
Cached:           186064 kB
SwapCached:            0 kB
Active:            43316 kB
Inactive:         194664 kB
Active(anon):      15076 kB
Inactive(anon):    15276 kB
Active(file):      28240 kB
Inactive(file):   179388 kB
Unevictable:           0 kB
Mlocked:               0 kB
HighTotal:             0 kB
HighFree:              0 kB
LowTotal:         253692 kB
LowFree:            3680 kB
SwapTotal:        262136 kB
SwapFree:         262136 kB
Dirty:                16 kB
Writeback:             0 kB
AnonPages:         29200 kB
Mapped:            11308 kB
Shmem:              1152 kB
Slab:               8264 kB
SReclaimable:       5104 kB
SUnreclaim:         3160 kB
KernelStack:         672 kB
PageTables:          708 kB
NFS_Unstable:          0 kB
Bounce:                0 kB
WritebackTmp:          0 kB
CommitLimit:      388980 kB
Committed_AS:      98168 kB
VmallocTotal:     598008 kB
VmallocUsed:         844 kB
VmallocChunk:     597016 kB
HardwareCorrupted:     0 kB
HugePages_Total:       0
HugePages_Free:        0
HugePages_Rsvd:        0
HugePages_Surp:        0
Hugepagesize:       2048 kB
DirectMap4k:      262144 kB
DirectMap2M:           0 kB

DD硬盘I/O测试

[email protected]:~# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=4k oflag=dsync
4096+0 records in
4096+0 records out
268435456 bytes (268 MB) copied, 5.68346 s, 47.2 MB/s

下载测试:

--2012-10-16 01:18:09--  http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net... 205.234.175.175
Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|205.234.175.175|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: `100mb.test'

100%[======================================>] 104,857,600 14.2M/s   in 6.8s

2012-10-16 01:18:16 (14.7 MB/s) - `100mb.test' saved [104857600/104857600]

UBI整体跑分测试:
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)

System: s1.gongyi.net: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.32-5-686-bigmem -- #1 SMP Mon Oct 3 05:03:32 UTC 2011
Machine: i686 (unknown)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="UTF-8", collate="UTF-8")
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz (4000.0 bogomips)
MMX, Physical Address Ext, Intel virtualization
CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz (4000.0 bogomips)
MMX, Physical Address Ext, Intel virtualization
CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz (4000.0 bogomips)
MMX, Physical Address Ext, Intel virtualization
CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 0 @ 2.00GHz (4000.0 bogomips)
MMX, Physical Address Ext, Intel virtualization
00:16:51 up  1:03,  1 user,  load average: 0.08, 0.02, 0.01; runlevel 2

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Tue Oct 16 2012 00:16:51 - 00:44:49
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       10932321.9 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     1895.8 MWIPS (10.2 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               1163.1 lps   (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        234370.5 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           60202.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        693669.5 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                              377229.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                  45395.3 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               2093.5 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   2823.3 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    797.4 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                         378766.7 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   10932321.9    936.8
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       1895.8    344.7
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       1163.1    270.5
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     234370.5    591.8
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0      60202.0    363.8
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0     693669.5   1196.0
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0     377229.3    303.2
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0      45395.3    113.5
Process Creation                                126.0       2093.5    166.2
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       2823.3    665.9
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        797.4   1329.0
System Call Overhead                          15000.0     378766.7    252.5
========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                         418.3

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Tue Oct 16 2012 00:44:49 - 01:12:51
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables       39795431.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone                     7496.1 MWIPS (10.2 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput                               2735.0 lps   (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks        243956.0 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks           65188.8 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks        866754.9 KBps  (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput                             1484160.4 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching                 138240.0 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation                               3749.9 lps   (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                   6143.9 lpm   (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                    807.8 lpm   (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead                        1300660.2 lps   (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values               BASELINE       RESULT    INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables         116700.0   39795431.0   3410.1
Double-Precision Whetstone                       55.0       7496.1   1362.9
Execl Throughput                                 43.0       2735.0    636.1
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks          3960.0     243956.0    616.1
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks            1655.0      65188.8    393.9
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks          5800.0     866754.9   1494.4
Pipe Throughput                               12440.0    1484160.4   1193.1
Pipe-based Context Switching                   4000.0     138240.0    345.6
Process Creation                                126.0       3749.9    297.6
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent)                     42.4       6143.9   1449.0
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent)                      6.0        807.8   1346.3
System Call Overhead                          15000.0    1300660.2    867.1
========
System Benchmarks Index Score                                         882.3

发表评论

:?: :razz: :sad: :evil: :!: :smile: :oops: :grin: :eek: :shock: :???: :cool: :lol: :mad: :twisted: :roll: :wink: :idea: :arrow: :neutral: :cry: :mrgreen:

目前评论:3   其中:访客  1   博主  1

    • avatar 阿福 0

      我以为你评测的是邝总的LOCVPS呢。。。原来是LFCVPS。。。东岸比较遥远啊。

        • avatar admin Admin

          @阿福 丹佛什么时候变成东岸了?你把它搬家了?我不是说了在加州右边么?