A-A+

smartvps(香港)简单测评

2013年01月31日 VPS测评 评论 10 条

smartvps
下午在上班的时候QQ上面有自称来自smartvps的人加我,要我帮忙测评一下他们的VPS并发布在www.zhujiceping.com上,VPS由smartvps提供。本人说明一下:本次测评,仅代表个人观点;官方将测评过的VPS保留3个月的使用时间,我不也不差你这个VPS,别以为我拿了什么好处,所以大家就不用多想说我就写好看的...
VPS Pro就是官方的高级版:4核CPU,2G内存,4G突发,80G硬盘,1个IPV4,1个IPV6,不限流量,参看http://smartvps.cn/product.html

先说smartvps后台优点:简单、干净、易操作,再说缺点:操作系统之间的切换需要5分钟或者更长时间,重装系统也是一样。习惯了solusvm的你习惯么?一键搞定的事儿分了两次!

smartvps1

smartvps-2

【1】安装lnmp.org的一键环境包,整个过程从19:57分开始,20:53分结束!

【2】安装完成后没做任何动作,看TOP结果:
smartvps香港

【3】CPU
root@hkg-vps-srv004:/# cat /proc/cpuinfo
processor : 0
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 45
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2430L 0 @ 2.00GHz
stepping : 7
cpu MHz : 798.843
cache size : 15360 KB
physical id : 0
siblings : 1
core id : 0
cpu cores : 1
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 13
wp : yes
flags : fpu de tsc msr pae cx8 apic sep cmov pat clflush acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht syscall nx lm constant_tsc ida arat pni ssse3 cx16 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt lahf_lm
bogomips : 5027.01
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 46 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor : 1
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 45
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2430L 0 @ 2.00GHz
stepping : 7
cpu MHz : 798.843
cache size : 15360 KB
physical id : 1
siblings : 1
core id : 0
cpu cores : 1
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 13
wp : yes
flags : fpu de tsc msr pae cx8 apic sep cmov pat clflush acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht syscall nx lm constant_tsc ida arat pni ssse3 cx16 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt lahf_lm
bogomips : 5027.01
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 46 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor : 2
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 45
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2430L 0 @ 2.00GHz
stepping : 7
cpu MHz : 798.843
cache size : 15360 KB
physical id : 2
siblings : 1
core id : 0
cpu cores : 1
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 13
wp : yes
flags : fpu de tsc msr pae cx8 apic sep cmov pat clflush acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht syscall nx lm constant_tsc ida arat pni ssse3 cx16 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt lahf_lm
bogomips : 5027.01
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 46 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

processor : 3
vendor_id : GenuineIntel
cpu family : 6
model : 45
model name : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2430L 0 @ 2.00GHz
stepping : 7
cpu MHz : 798.843
cache size : 15360 KB
physical id : 3
siblings : 1
core id : 0
cpu cores : 1
fpu : yes
fpu_exception : yes
cpuid level : 13
wp : yes
flags : fpu de tsc msr pae cx8 apic sep cmov pat clflush acpi mmx fxsr sse sse2 ss ht syscall nx lm constant_tsc ida arat pni ssse3 cx16 sse4_1 sse4_2 popcnt lahf_lm
bogomips : 5027.01
clflush size : 64
cache_alignment : 64
address sizes : 46 bits physical, 48 bits virtual
power management:

【4】内存
root@hkg-vps-srv004:/# cat /proc/meminfo
MemTotal: 4194304 kB
MemFree: 4072484 kB
Buffers: 0 kB
Cached: 0 kB
SwapCached: 0 kB
Active: 0 kB
Inactive: 0 kB
HighTotal: 0 kB
HighFree: 0 kB
LowTotal: 4194304 kB
LowFree: 4072484 kB
SwapTotal: 0 kB
SwapFree: 0 kB
Dirty: 0 kB
Writeback: 0 kB
AnonPages: 0 kB
Mapped: 0 kB
Slab: 0 kB
PageTables: 0 kB
NFS_Unstable: 0 kB
Bounce: 0 kB
CommitLimit: 0 kB
Committed_AS: 0 kB
VmallocTotal: 0 kB
VmallocUsed: 0 kB
VmallocChunk: 0 kB

【5】硬盘
root@hkg-vps-srv004:/# df -h
Filesystem Size Used Avail Use% Mounted on
/dev/simfs 80G 1.7G 79G 3% /
tmpfs 2.0G 0 2.0G 0% /lib/init/rw
tmpfs 2.0G 0 2.0G 0% /dev/shm

【6】硬盘I/O
root@hkg-vps-srv004:/# dd if=/dev/zero of=test bs=64k count=16k oflag=dsync
16384+0 records in
16384+0 records out
1073741824 bytes (1.1 GB) copied, 23.2459 s, 46.2 MB/s

【7】WGET下载
root@hkg-vps-srv004:/# wget http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
--2013-01-31 21:07:16-- http://cachefly.cachefly.net/100mb.test
Resolving cachefly.cachefly.net... 204.93.150.151
Connecting to cachefly.cachefly.net|204.93.150.151|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 104857600 (100M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: `100mb.test'

100%[=============================================>] 104,857,600 847K/s in 2m 29s

2013-01-31 21:09:45 (688 KB/s) - `100mb.test' saved [104857600/104857600]
补充一下下载腾讯QQ软件的数据
root@hkg-vps-srv004:/# wget http://dl_dir.qq.com/qqfile/qq/QQ2012/QQ2012.exe
--2013-01-31 21:09:53-- http://dl_dir.qq.com/qqfile/qq/QQ2012/QQ2012.exe
Resolving dl_dir.qq.com... 205.177.133.137, 205.177.133.130, 205.177.133.131, ...
Connecting to dl_dir.qq.com|205.177.133.137|:80... connected.
HTTP request sent, awaiting response... 200 OK
Length: 56800672 (54M) [application/octet-stream]
Saving to: `QQ2012.exe'

100%[=============================================>] 56,800,672 899K/s in 62s

2013-01-31 21:10:55 (896 KB/s) - `QQ2012.exe' saved [56800672/56800672]

【8】UBI综合跑分

Version 5.1.2 Based on the Byte Magazine Unix Benchmark

Multi-CPU version Version 5 revisions by Ian Smith,
Sunnyvale, CA, USA
December 22, 2007 johantheghost at yahoo period com

1 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3

1 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3

1 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3

1 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3

1 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Process Creation 1 2 3

1 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

1 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3

1 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3

4 x Dhrystone 2 using register variables 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

4 x Double-Precision Whetstone 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

4 x Execl Throughput 1 2 3

4 x File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 1 2 3

4 x File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1 2 3

4 x File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 1 2 3

4 x Pipe Throughput 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

4 x Pipe-based Context Switching 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

4 x Process Creation 1 2 3

4 x System Call Overhead 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10

4 x Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1 2 3

4 x Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 1 2 3

========================================================================
BYTE UNIX Benchmarks (Version 5.1.2)

System: hkg-vps-srv004: GNU/Linux
OS: GNU/Linux -- 2.6.18-194.3.1.el5.028stab069.6xen -- #1 SMP Wed May 26 18:35:38 MSD 2010
Machine: i686 (unknown)
Language: en_US.utf8 (charmap="ANSI_X3.4-1968", collate="ANSI_X3.4-1968")
CPU 0: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2430L 0 @ 2.00GHz (5027.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
CPU 1: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2430L 0 @ 2.00GHz (5027.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
CPU 2: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2430L 0 @ 2.00GHz (5027.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
CPU 3: Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2430L 0 @ 2.00GHz (5027.0 bogomips)
Hyper-Threading, x86-64, MMX, Physical Address Ext, SYSENTER/SYSEXIT, SYSCALL/SYSRET
21:17:09 up 1:31, 1 user, load average: 0.00, 0.00, 0.16; runlevel 2

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Thu Jan 31 2013 21:17:09 - 21:45:06
4 CPUs in system; running 1 parallel copy of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 8434556.7 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 1403.8 MWIPS (8.5 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 692.7 lps (29.9 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 130124.6 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 39203.8 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 434664.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 187112.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 16997.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 2050.9 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1563.8 lpm (60.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 255.7 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 168994.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 8434556.7 722.8
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 1403.8 255.2
Execl Throughput 43.0 692.7 161.1
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 130124.6 328.6
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 39203.8 236.9
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 434664.7 749.4
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 187112.4 150.4
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 16997.0 42.5
Process Creation 126.0 2050.9 162.8
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 1563.8 368.8
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 255.7 426.1
System Call Overhead 15000.0 168994.3 112.7
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 237.3

------------------------------------------------------------------------
Benchmark Run: Thu Jan 31 2013 21:45:06 - 22:16:16
4 CPUs in system; running 4 parallel copies of tests

Dhrystone 2 using register variables 10952249.3 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Double-Precision Whetstone 4569.3 MWIPS (10.2 s, 7 samples)
Execl Throughput 1112.2 lps (29.8 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 112350.0 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 29832.2 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 356544.7 KBps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Pipe Throughput 271601.5 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Pipe-based Context Switching 71379.4 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)
Process Creation 2751.0 lps (30.0 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 1880.9 lpm (60.1 s, 2 samples)
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 252.4 lpm (60.6 s, 2 samples)
System Call Overhead 230981.0 lps (10.0 s, 7 samples)

System Benchmarks Index Values BASELINE RESULT INDEX
Dhrystone 2 using register variables 116700.0 10952249.3 938.5
Double-Precision Whetstone 55.0 4569.3 830.8
Execl Throughput 43.0 1112.2 258.6
File Copy 1024 bufsize 2000 maxblocks 3960.0 112350.0 283.7
File Copy 256 bufsize 500 maxblocks 1655.0 29832.2 180.3
File Copy 4096 bufsize 8000 maxblocks 5800.0 356544.7 614.7
Pipe Throughput 12440.0 271601.5 218.3
Pipe-based Context Switching 4000.0 71379.4 178.4
Process Creation 126.0 2751.0 218.3
Shell Scripts (1 concurrent) 42.4 1880.9 443.6
Shell Scripts (8 concurrent) 6.0 252.4 420.7
System Call Overhead 15000.0 230981.0 154.0
========
System Benchmarks Index Score 328.0

  • 版权所有:©2012-2016 主机测评. All rights reserved
  • 内容来源:"优惠信息"为站长翻译官方信息,“测评”,“商家介绍”,“教程”等为站长原创
  • 安全提醒:购买请仔细阅读商家条款,阅读本站网友评论、或加群咨询,谨慎交易,自担风险
  • 联系站长: QQ 20510761,支持主机代购、代付等
  • 邮件订阅点击此处,订阅“主机测评”
  • QQ群聊:486721,第一手热门资讯及时获取,欢迎任何健康的交流内容。

10 条留言  访客:5 条  博主:5 条

  1. Heaphy

    这。。。太差了。

    • admin

      O(∩_∩)O~ 确实比较一般!香港VPS还有vr.org可选啊!

  2. 恋花

    跑分低了点~

    • admin

      确实是低了点儿,这个和美国的VPS基本上是没得比的,和国内的阿里云的跑分差不多吧估计,从服务器性能来说就是一低端货!

  3. 大嘴鸭

    看起来还行吧。博主要是能搞到优惠码,,我就入个。

    • admin

      @大嘴鸭:我只能帮你问问,不过估计没戏!

  4. 恋花

    电信通在loc上看只要40块钱一个月了~.~
    性能肯定比香港的这个好,不过要备案,而且不稳定,母鸡易重启..

    • admin

      @恋花:性能上稍微好点儿,然后就是看服务器稳定性和带宽了!香港的小水管我实在的不喜欢,习惯了美国的大水桶!

  5. 听听

    还可以吧
    还有79元的啊。
    这个可以试试。

    • admin

      @听听:哪一家啊?我就知道vr.org的还不错!

给我留言